Measured on IBM Quantum Hardware · February 2026

Emergent Spacetime
from Entanglement

Andrew Thurlow · 528 Labs
Scroll to explore
01 — The Question

Is spacetime made of entanglement?

In 2010, physicist Mark Van Raamsdonk proposed a radical idea: spacetime isn't fundamental. It emerges from quantum entanglement between fields. Remove the entanglement, and spacetime tears apart.

This idea remained purely theoretical for 15 years. No one had tested it on real quantum hardware. We built a framework to do exactly that.

🔗

Entanglement

Quantum correlations between particles that persist regardless of distance. Einstein called it "spooky action at a distance."

🌌

Spacetime

The fabric of the universe — the stage on which all physics plays out. General relativity describes its curvature.

The Connection

If entanglement creates spacetime, then quantum computers — which create entanglement on demand — can create tiny spacetimes in the lab.

02 — The Setup

Two chains of qubits. One universe.

We use two coupled chains of 4 qubits each — a minimal model of two entangled quantum fields. The coupling strength λ controls how much entanglement exists between them.

Chain A — Field φ₁
q0
q1
q2
q3
q4
q5
q6
q7
Chain B — Field φ₂
↕ Gold lines = inter-chain coupling (strength λ) — this is what creates spacetime
8
Qubits
133
Available on Torino
6
Trotter Steps
8,192
Shots per Circuit

The experiment runs on IBM Torino (133-qubit Heron r1) and IBM Fez (156-qubit Heron r2) — real quantum processors accessible through the cloud.

03 — The Experiments

Eight experiments. One framework.

Over five days, we ran eight hardware experiments scaling from 8 to 128 qubits, testing different Hamiltonians, measurement bases, and architectures.

Experiment 1

The Lambda Sweep

Vary coupling strength from 0 to 2.0. Watch cross-chain correlations grow. Coupling ratio: 27.9× above baseline. Spacetime forms as entanglement increases.

Experiment 2

The Null Hypothesis

Run a single chain without a partner. Result: 10-20× less geometric signal. Geometry requires TWO coupled fields — it's relational, not intrinsic.

Experiment 3

Universality Test

Ising (ZZ) vs Heisenberg (ZZ+XX) coupling. Both produce the same geometry curve: r = 0.89 correlation. Different physics, same spacetime.

Experiment 4

16-Qubit Scale

Double the system size to 8+8. Geometry persists and strengthens. The framework scales.

Experiment 5

128-Qubit Full Chip

Use 128 of 133 qubits on IBM Torino. 16 independent experiments running simultaneously. Geometry emerges across the entire processor.

Experiment 6

Multi-Basis Discovery

Measure in Z, X, and Y bases. Each basis reveals a different geometric component. The Hamiltonian symmetry determines which direction is strongest.

Experiment 7

Metric Tensor Extraction

Combine three bases into a diagonal metric tensor. Positive definite everywhere. 100% triangle inequality satisfaction. This IS a metric.

Experiment 8

Gravitational Analysis

Apply Jacobson's derivation: G_eff = 1/(4λC). Direction-dependent gravity. Universal total gravitational coupling: r = 0.9987. Singularity at λ=0.

04 — The Lambda Sweep

Turn up the coupling. Watch spacetime form.

Drag the slider to change the coupling strength λ. The bars show the cross-chain correlation — the geometric signal — measured on IBM Torino hardware.

λ = 0 (no coupling) λ = 2.0 (strong coupling)
λ = 1.0
C_ZZ: 0.1714
C_XX: 0.0169
C_YY: 0.0198
27.9×
coupling ratio
Peak geometry. Spacetime fully formed.
05 — The Metric Tensor

Spacetime has shape. We measured it.

By measuring in three bases (Z, X, Y), we extract a diagonal metric tensor — the mathematical object that describes the geometry of spacetime. Each component tells you how "deep" spacetime is in that direction.

Ising Coupling
XY Coupling
Z-COMPONENT
0.1714
dominant — coupling direction
X-COMPONENT
0.0169
weak — perpendicular
Y-COMPONENT
0.0198
weak — perpendicular
ANISOTROPY
10.1×
FLATNESS
0.099
SHAPE
Needle →
POSITIVE DEFINITE
✓ YES

The Ising Hamiltonian couples in Z, so the Z-component is 10× larger — spacetime is elongated along the coupling direction like a needle. The XY Hamiltonian couples in X and Y, producing a disk-shaped geometry instead. The Hamiltonian determines the shape. The coupling determines the size.

06 — Emergent Gravity

Where geometry is weak, gravity is strong.

Applying Jacobson's thermodynamic derivation to each tensor component gives direction-dependent gravitational constants. The result: gravity is strongest where spacetime is thinnest.

THE EQUATION
Geff = 1 / (4 λ · C)
Strong entanglement (C↑) → Strong geometry → Weak gravity (G↓)
Zero entanglement (C=0) → No geometry → Infinite gravity (G=∞) → Singularity
1.46
G_Z (Ising) — Weak gravity
14.79
G_X (Ising) — Strong gravity
G at λ=0 — Singularity
TOTAL GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT — UNIVERSALITY CHECK
r = 0.9987
Ising and XY produce the same total gravity
Different Hamiltonians. Different tensor shapes. Different directional gravity. But the total gravitational coupling is virtually identical. This is the equivalence principle emerging from entanglement data.
07 — Key Findings

Twelve results. All from hardware.

Finding 01

Geometry scales with coupling

Cross-field correlations increase smoothly with λ. Coupling ratio: 27.9× (Ising Z-basis).

Finding 02

Spacetime tears upon decoupling

62–92% correlation collapse at λ=0, consistent with Van Raamsdonk's prediction.

Finding 03

Two fields required

Single-chain control shows 10-20× less signal. Geometry is relational, not intrinsic.

Finding 04

Universal across Hamiltonians

Ising and Heisenberg produce the same geometry curve (r = 0.89). Different matter, same spacetime.

Finding 05

Scales from 8 to 128 qubits

Framework reproduces at 8, 16, and 128 qubits. Geometry persists at all scales tested.

Finding 06

Geometry has tensor structure

Multi-basis measurement reveals basis-dependent components. Z-coupling produces Z-dominant geometry.

Finding 07

Positive definite metric

All diagonal components positive at every λ. The emergent structure satisfies the mathematical definition of a metric.

Finding 08

100% triangle inequality satisfaction

56 out of 56 triangles satisfy the inequality for both Hamiltonians. Distances are consistent.

Finding 09

Geometric phase transition

Ricci scalar analog shows inflection at λ≈0.31 — accelerating to decelerating geometry, analogous to inflation.

Finding 10

Eigenvalue evolution

Flatness drops from 0.84 (sphere) to 0.07 (needle). The Hamiltonian sculpts the shape of spacetime.

Finding 11

Direction-dependent gravity

G_eff varies by 10× across directions. Gravity pulls perpendicular to the strongest geometry.

Finding 12

Universal gravitational coupling

Total G_trace correlates at r = 0.9987 across Hamiltonians. The equivalence principle from entanglement.

08 — What's Next

From toy model to quantum gravity.

This framework is at the trailhead of quantum gravity. The results are consistent with theoretical predictions, but the journey from 8 qubits to a complete theory of quantum gravity is vast.

⚛️

Cross-Platform Validation

Run the same experiments on IonQ trapped ion hardware via Amazon Braket. If geometry reproduces on atoms instead of wires, it's a property of quantum mechanics itself.

💥

Big Bang Experiment

Ramp coupling from zero across Trotter steps. Watch spacetime emerge from nothing. Measure the curvature history of a toy universe from birth to maturity.

🕳️

Black Hole Analog

Create a spatial gradient in coupling — strong center, weak edges. Look for a horizon where geometry changes character.

🌊

Gravitational Waves

Oscillate coupling sinusoidally. If the oscillation propagates along the chain with delay, that's a propagating disturbance in emergent geometry.

Open Source
All code, data, and figures are public.
VIEW ON GITHUB →